Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis

Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis

Share this post

Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis
Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis
Philosophers Probably Shouldn't Respond to Right-Wing Authoritarianism by Limiting the Sphere of Acceptable Inquiry

Philosophers Probably Shouldn't Respond to Right-Wing Authoritarianism by Limiting the Sphere of Acceptable Inquiry

A response to Talia Bettcher's essay "While Tables Burn: On the (Non) Existence of Trans People and the Failure of Philosophy"

Ben Burgis's avatar
Ben Burgis
Feb 16, 2025
∙ Paid
86

Share this post

Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis
Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis
Philosophers Probably Shouldn't Respond to Right-Wing Authoritarianism by Limiting the Sphere of Acceptable Inquiry
17
Share

There is no view so absurd, Cicero said, that some philosopher hasn’t advocated it. Put that together with how esoteric some branches of philosophy have gotten in the ultra-specialized context of 21st-century academia, and you get some very odd debates.

A classic example is the one often half-jokingly summarized as, “Do tables exist?”

I say “half-” jokin…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Ben Burgis
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share